Target tracking with the Performance Integrity layer built in — so an achievement percentage is checked for credibility, not just taken at face value.
Built around a simple idea: a target hit after being quietly lowered three times isn't the same achievement as a target hit as originally set.
If a target changes, the original, the revision, and the stated reason are all preserved — not overwritten, so the full history is always visible to anyone reviewing performance later.
Achievement percentage and Target Integrity are tracked as two distinct numbers, so a target hit through repeated downward revision doesn't look identical to one hit as originally set.
Patterns in how often a manager's revisions hold up build into a longer-term credibility signal — visible across months, not just judged month to month in isolation.
If several managers in similar conditions all cite the same external factor for underperformance, and one doesn't, that's surfaced automatically — not as an accusation, but as a pattern worth a closer look.
Goals can be tracked for a whole branch or for an individual within it — so a blended team result never hides a specific person's consistent over- or under-performance.
Goals tracking serves different purposes depending on where someone sits in the organization.
Reviews Target Integrity and Manager Credibility alongside raw achievement, to understand which results genuinely reflect strong performance.
Sets and tracks targets for their team, with full visibility into how their own credibility signal is building over time.
Sees their own personal target progress clearly, even within a team or branch result that might otherwise blend everyone's numbers together.
Four branch managers in similar conditions all cited a regional supply delay for missing target this quarter. This manager cited the same reason — but unlike the other three, also revised the target down twice beforehand, and the original target was still achievable based on comparable branch data. The pattern, not any single revision, is what triggers the flag.
Credibility measures honesty in reporting, not the result itself. A manager who missed an unrevised target and reported it plainly has a clean, trustworthy record. A manager who hit a heavily revised target has technically "achieved" it, but the integrity behind that number is weaker — and Zimpl is built to make that distinction visible rather than rewarding the appearance of success over the truth of it.
Goals draws on data from across the platform to check whether an achievement holds up under scrutiny.
A short walkthrough is the fastest way to see how your companies map into the platform.